riverjeep
Well-known member
Please tell me you aren’t one of those guys putting fake badging on their vehicles!You realize you can just peel the MOAB stickers off and add the "rubicon" stickers.. It's a jeep, not a Ferrari lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please tell me you aren’t one of those guys putting fake badging on their vehicles!You realize you can just peel the MOAB stickers off and add the "rubicon" stickers.. It's a jeep, not a Ferrari lol
It’s got them also.And the FEs have power seats. I haven’t seen that spec on the Moab yet.
Not sure what you are reading as I just posted the section showing it has power seats same as Rubicon 392. But, for clarification the MOAB 392 has the same black leather power left and right seats as the Rubicon Final Edition 392's without any wording/stitching on the upper part of the seats.If I’m reading that chart correctly, it’s got cloth seats?
NO it is Nappa Leather.If I’m reading that chart correctly, it’s got cloth seats?
What have you confirmed about the lockers and disconnect?NO it is Nappa Leather.
The pages that show standard features can be misleading if reading them segregated from the rest of code guide.
MOAB is a specific package (27X) that rides on the existing 392 (JLJX74) model.
The MOAB part specifies nappa leather in a different area.
Had this issue when trying to confirm the lockers & disconnect the other day, threw me for a loop for a few minutes!
Really the only item of substance is the $2k winch, without that they are a straight $19k less than the 25’s.It has lockers and disconnect. We are all trying to find a reason why this thing is 20k less, but the reality is, there was no reason for the 392 to be so expensive. No winch, no decals, no painted arches... that's about it.
Yup only differences are the black plastic fenders and gold decals / accents. I completely agree the last few years of the Rubicon 392 were out of whack on pricing.It has lockers and disconnect. We are all trying to find a reason why this thing is 20k less, but the reality is, there was no reason for the 392 to be so expensive. No winch, no decals, no painted arches... that's about it.
That says bronzed smoked wheels. The video also has a standard hood in a few clips. I just really want those final editions to drop to 80 and call it a day.Not sure what you are reading as I just posted the section showing it has power seats same as Rubicon 392. But, for clarification the MOAB 392 has the same black leather power left and right seats as the Rubicon Final Edition 392's without any wording/stitching on the upper part of the seats.
Other than the fenders and the winch for all intensive purposes you have everything a Final Edition has. Don’t pay attention to some of the ambiguity in the early marketing material.The video shows a different hood but then shows the standard 392 hood.
That says bronzed smoked wheels. The video also has a standard hood in a few clips. I just really want those final editions to drop to 80 and call it a day.
Good point, that's the same as my non FE '24.The MOAB also seems to have the regular rock rails like the first rock 392s.
I’m curious about the drone you reference as I also have a ‘24 but, have no such drone with mine. Does this drone come at any particular speed and with baffles open or closed? Full disclosure I operate mine in the closed/quiet mode most of the time.Curious to see if the Moab suffers from the exhaust drone some of us '24 MY + are impacted with.
It's around the 1500-1800 rpm range, open or closed. I had it with stock exhaust, upgraded to AWE switchpath for more aggressive tone and hoped the drone would be less but it's even boomier.I’m curious about the drone you reference as I also have a ‘24 but, have no such drone with mine. Does this drone come at any particular speed and with baffles open or closed? Full disclosure I operate mine in the closed/quiet mode most of the time.