Sport Tcase Swap

Sorry, here's the correctly oriented view of the transmission side.

392 front case vs 850RE oriented.webp
 
Mopar might have increased clamping force on the clutches and changed the programming but as long as you have an engine capable of 470 ft lbs of torque heavy duty use say in the sand or where the front end is pulling the Jeep over an obstacle is still going to be very taxing on it.

The front clutch is the weak point, it might be fine especially for a mall crawler or if your running a FAD unit, but it your a serious off-roader you need to consider the Atlas or MP1622C. I love to blast around in White Sands NM from time to time so I am even considering a MP1622C conversion even though most of the time its a mall crawler.
 
Mopar might have increased clamping force on the clutches and changed the programming but as long as you have an engine capable of 470 ft lbs of torque heavy duty use say in the sand or where the front end is pulling the Jeep over an obstacle is still going to be very taxing on it.

The front clutch is the weak point, it might be fine especially for a mall crawler or if your running a FAD unit, but it your a serious off-roader you need to consider the Atlas or MP1622C. I love to blast around in White Sands NM from time to time so I am even considering a MP1622C conversion even though most of the time its a mall crawler.
Yea it might have been beef’d up but if its still clutched eventually it will give you issues.
 
Hi,

Is there anything that would prevent using a pre-2024 rear MP1622C on a post 2024 Front MP3022 case?

Regards,
Jim
 

Create an account or login to comment

Join now to leave a comment enjoy browsing the site ad-free!

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top