Canadian 392
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #41
Yeah, Canadian 392 I personally think you have a point. How else can it be explained that some 392 models have the drone and some do not? There are many testimonials to be found similar to these: https://share.cleanshot.com/Gd2S4P3p, https://share.cleanshot.com/nf4mj0BZ.
For some, the solution has been to properly "feed" the ANC (by connecting the hardtop wiring): https://www.jlwranglerforums.com/forum/threads/reverb-from-sub-resolved.93193/
Some others go at great lengths to disconnect the audio or change the exhaust (which apparently improves the situation but is still a lottery and quite subjective it seems). It's quite interesting and entertaining (laughing through tears) to read what others have been trying out to remove the drone: https://www.jlwranglerforums.com/forum/threads/droning-is-actually-the-sub-reverbing-update.103794/
There are some that suggest a particular engineering issue (lack of grounding somewhere on the electric installation which confuses the ANC). Some were suggesting that the exhaust pipes touch other elements of the undercarriage.
The weird thing is that none of YT vids (posted by amateur car reviewers and car journalists alike) never mention the drone. Is it just that there is a bunch of us 392 owners that are extremely unlucky?
If the issue is so infrequent, it's less surprising that local dealerships have no idea how to deal with it or that they simply deny it even exists. I would count on Jeep Corporate who hopefully are as amazing at customer support/engineering as they are at marketing (the H.Ford commercial is on another level). Brands must do recalls on safety issues of their vehicles. Some (top) brands, address issues because they want to. Which is it for Jeep?
I have messaged Jeep Cares and have asked them to contribute to this discussion. Something needs to be done by Jeep corporate, on a public level, for all affected customers to benefit from.
Screen shot of my message to Jeep Cares is attached.