NeoLeo
Well-known member
Hi Friends - Just came across this on the tube: How to make your 392 2WD
No affiliation; waiting for my 392, blah blah… Would you do this?
No affiliation; waiting for my 392, blah blah… Would you do this?
Make your 392 2WD?
- Thread starter NeoLeo
- Start date
Plenty of us on this forum have the updated JL Tazer and I know quite a few have done this and some like to keep it in 2wd. I’ve done it several times but really just to show off. In my opinion it feels more planted in 4wd. Any hard launches in 2wd and you are smoking the tires. Let’s not even talk about when it’s wet.
Or the cost of replacing rear tires quarterly!
Exactly! Smoking 37s is only good for my ego, not my wallet
hardhat
Well-known member
I don't think it offers a whole lot in the way of advantages. The 392 does not have a front axle disconnect (FAD), so front shaft will be spinning in 2wd anyway. Now if you had FAD, it could be worthwhile. Would eliminate pinion angle concerns with higher lifts if you could stop front shaft from spinning altogether.
As it stands, the 4WD works wonderfully and wet traction is insane. I have done some pretty hard launches that would've left my JK spinning its wet tires (traction control off) or the traction light coming on and it hobbling up to speed. The 392 just hooks up and goes. It is incredibly impressive.
I will only be using 2wd for cutting up
As it stands, the 4WD works wonderfully and wet traction is insane. I have done some pretty hard launches that would've left my JK spinning its wet tires (traction control off) or the traction light coming on and it hobbling up to speed. The 392 just hooks up and goes. It is incredibly impressive.
I will only be using 2wd for cutting up
Create an account or login to comment
Join now to leave a comment enjoy browsing the site ad-free!
Create account
Create an account on our community. It's easy!
Log in
Already have an account? Log in here.
