Stronger brakes (to me) means more "brake torque" applied to the rotor. This can be done (not an exhaustive list) by bigger pads (larger sweep area), more aggressive pads (with more bite), larger diameter rotors and appropriate new caliper holders, or things that increase the amount of pressure that can be applied to the pads (different master cylinder, for example). Heavier but same size brake rotors give the systems a little more thermal capacity, but don't necessarily increase brake bite.
Slotted and/or vented rotors don't do much, if anything. More aggressive pads can help, but usually have some (or all) or the following drawbacks: noisier, more dust, more rotor wear, less bite when cold. Upgrading calipers can be a challenge because the master cylinder "stroke" is designed to move a certain amount of fluid--4 piston calipers (vs a 1 piston caliper) may need more fluid to move those 4 pistons the same amount, thus lengthening the brake pedal travel (which can lead to the perception that the brakes are weaker, even though the brake torque delivered may ultimately be more).
I have 15 years of performance driving instruction experience, and currently live in the Jeep JK world. When I went about upgrading those brakes I searched for a more aggressive pad (I would have been fine with noise, dust, and increased rotor wear). I tried a few and none were really much better than stock. I was hoping to find an aggressive biting track pad but nope. So ended up with Ram 1500 brakes on the front, and a spaced away from centerline caliper and larger diameter rotor in the rear--and the new brakes are awesome. My understanding is that JL brakes were upgraded from the JK, and that the 392 has slightly upgraded brakes from the non-392 Wrangler. But haven't driven one (yet) so no clue if they are adequate.